Filed: Mar. 15, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 15, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-70041 MICHAEL WAYNE HALL, Petitioner-Appellant versus NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth (06-CV-436) Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judg
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 15, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-70041 MICHAEL WAYNE HALL, Petitioner-Appellant versus NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth (06-CV-436) Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judge..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
March 15, 2007
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-70041
MICHAEL WAYNE HALL,
Petitioner-Appellant
versus
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,
Respondent-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth
(06-CV-436)
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
We grant a certificate of appealability on Michael Wayne
Hall’s Atkins claim.1 The case will be scheduled for oral argument
before this panel.
We are not presently persuaded to grant and we defer decision
upon the application for a certificate of appealability on Hall’s
Ring2 and Penry3 claims until after oral argument. The Court does
1
Atkins v. Virginia ,
506 U.S. 314 (2002); Hall v. Texas,
537 U.S. 802 (2002).
2
Ring v. Arizona,
536 U.S. 584 (2002).
3
Penry v. Johnson,
532 U.S. 782 (2001).
not request but the parties may supplement the Ring and Penry
claims and offer argument, if they wish to do so.
So ORDERED.
2